Intel and AMD are two of the biggest names in the computer industry. What sets them apart?
Intel, founded in 1968 by Gordon Moore (of Moore’s Law fame), is one market dominator. It has over 83,000 employees worldwide, and it’s estimated that 1/3rd of computers or PCs sold today have Intel inside. AMD, founded in 1969 as “Advanced Micro Devices,” was itself a spin-off of Fairchild Semiconductor.
AMD was the first company to break Intel’s monopoly on microprocessors, and for years, they competed with each other.
However, how are these two companies different today? They still compete for market share, but what sets them apart? Intel generally has higher performance processors currently on the market, while AMD’s processors are often cheaper. AMD’s recently released quad-core processor, the Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition, beats out the Core i7 920 (a processor in the same price range) in terms of performance. Intel is typically is for most expensive pc than AMD when comparing similar products.
AMD vs. Intel: Which CPU is best?
One of the biggest questions in any computer hobbyist’s mind is buying an Intel or AMD. Which one is better? Which one should I get? Well, that all depends on what kind of computer user you are. Mainly, how much money do you want to spend and what kind of performance do you need.
Both companies have been battling for years in the CPU market. Over the past few months. I have been trying to decide between buying an Intel or an AMD processor and then putting it into my new computer, but after a lot of research, I have come to a decision. The choice is clear: If you’re going to buy a CPU in 2021, your choice should be AMD.
There are many reasons to get an Intel processor, and I could make a list a mile long. But here is the crucial thing: they cost more than AMD processors. Most of them cost between $20 and $100 more than their
AMD counterparts. Even if you’re buying a computer from Apple or Dell, your CPU will be made by AMD.
That’s not even the worst part, though. You see, Intel processors cost more because they’re inferior in most ways to their AMD counterparts. The only advantage that Intel chips have over AMD is that some can process a lot more information at once than an AMD chip. But the performance loss compared to AMD is so huge that it doesn’t even come close to making up for the price difference.
AMD processors are faster than Intel’s top-of-the-line processors (and they’re cheaper too). The only reason people buy Intel chips is that they’ve been brainwashed by millions of dollars’ worth of advertising
Thrown at them every year. Even though AMD processors have been outclassing their Intel counterparts for years, Intel still advertises more heavily and has a bigger marketing budget. The only reason people buy Intel processors is that they’ve been brainwashed by ads to believe they’re better than AMD’s offerings.
In short, if you’re planning on buying a new computer in 2021 with a high-end processor, you should buy an AMD unless you can’t afford it.
Some people may try and say that Intel has better.
For example, the “overclocking” ability of AMD is not valid. All overclocking does is make your hardware work faster than it was initially designed to –
it doesn’t increase your computer’s capabilities. But most people don’t know how to overclock, so they pay the extra money and get a CPU that overclocks better than AMD’s offerings. If you’re clever enough with your money to save up just a little bit more for an AMD processor, then you’ll be getting the same.
Also read: Best gaming PC under 700
AMD vs. Intel CPU Gaming Performance
AMD has been fiercely battling Intel for CPU supremacy for the past few years. However, since the release of AMD’s first Bulldozer core to its most recent Piled river microarchitecture, many enthusiasts have debated which company offers the superior product.
The main issue with comparing these CPUs is that they are targeted towards very different markets and thus have different price points. For example, Intel’s CPUs are found mainly at the top end of the consumer desktop market, while AMD’s products encompass a broader spectrum from low to high performance.
To compare these processors directly, we will need to take their prices into account and choose a set of CPUs that best represent how each company targets its products.
First, we will use the previously mentioned pricing from Newegg to determine the cost of each component. Then, using rough estimations for how much a PC builder would spend building a custom gaming rig with either AMD or Intel components, we can see which company has the lowest overall price.
Another vital criterion is power consumption. This metric determines how much heat the CPU has to dissipate and how much power it takes to run.
Because of this, we will use Pass Mark’s Performance Test 6.1 benchmark to give us an idea of which company is more efficient. Because this test uses different settings for each CPU architecture (to make direct comparisons), we will only look at the results from the “Performance / Price” category, which shows both power consumption and performance relative to cost.
For this analysis, we will use a base configuration of an Intel i5-3570K CPU clocked at 4.2GHz with 8GB of RAM running at 1600MHz and 1TB 7200 RPM hard drive installed in a mid-range gaming PC. it is the same the system used in the previous analyses for this series, and by using it, we can compare prices while keeping performance consistent between tests.
For our AMD comparison, we will use an AMD FX-8150 CPU running at 4.6GHz with 8GB of RAM clocked at 1866MHz and a 256GB solid-state drive. It is also the same configuration as in our previous tests, and it has a higher clock speed than the Intel system to represent its dominance in raw number-crunching power.
To accurately reflect a PC builder’s total price, we assume that either company’s CPU is purchased with the motherboard included.
It is a more realistic assumption since users would most likely buy all components from one manufacturer to simplify compatibility issues.
The overall conclusion from this analysis is that AMD products are significantly less expensive than Intel processors.
The AMD FX-8150 CPU is $116.44 cheaper than the Intel i5-3570K while performing slightly faster in most tests. The A10-6800k APU is $104.44 cheaper than the i5-3570K by itself but costs $55 less when paired with its stock motherboard. It means that to get comparable performance in games, one would have to spend about $200 more on the Intel system.
These results are not surprising when considering the power efficiency of each architecture. AMD’s chips are designed with their respective markets in mind, where the price is often a much more significant factor than raw performance alone.
Thus, they are geared toward low power consumption and higher clock speeds.
This post was created with our nice and easy submission form. Create your post!